Some, but not all, charges dismissed,
so Santana, Vasquez must stand trial
by Tom Nadeau
Visiting Judge John Darlington has granted some – but not all – of the objections Yuba-Sutter attorneys Jesse Santana and David Vasquez raised in a motion to dismiss charges they may have violated certain rules of law and ethics during disputed legal negotiations.
That means the two attorneys may go on trial in Yuba County Superior Court at an as yet undetermined date. If the defense files no more objections before Aug. 13, the rulings go into effect Aug. 27.
Santana’s attorney, Roberto Marquez said in a blistering written statement that he intends to file a writ of mandamus with the Third District Court of Appeals on the grounds the indictment was tainted because the judge who presided over the indicting grand jury had a demonstrable history of prejudice against Santana.
The counts, one by one ... Read more »
Visiting Judge John Darlington has granted some – but not all – of the objections Yuba-Sutter attorneys Jesse Santana and David Vasquez raised in a motion to dismiss charges they may have violated certain rules of law and ethics during disputed legal negotiations.
That means the two attorneys may go on trial in Yuba County Superior Court at an as yet undetermined date. If the defense files no more objections before Aug. 13, the rulings go into effect Aug. 27.
Santana’s attorney, Roberto Marquez said in a blistering written statement that he intends to file a writ of mandamus with the Third District Court of Appeals on the grounds the indictment was tainted because the judge who presided over the indicting grand jury had a demonstrable history of prejudice against Santana.
The counts, one by one ... Read more »